BMAP5005 Dissertation L7 Module Handbook 2026-27 | De Montfort University
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your US, UK, Singapore college/ university Assignments.
| University | De Montfort University |
| Subject | BMAP5005 Dissertation |
BMAP5005 Dissertation
The dissertation module allows you to design and undertake a piece of academic research. In doing so, you have the opportunity to develop and demonstrate advanced scholarship skills. This dissertation module provides subject-specific training to ensure that you are prepared to complete a dissertation within the domains of marketing. As you will be undergoing research methods training at the same time, the module will start with a series of taught sessions that will focus on important areas such as the literature review, database searches and the dissertation structure, during which a dissertation design will be produced. After critically reviewing the relevant literature, you will clearly define your research topic and research questions, set up a robust methodology and then collect, analyse, and interpret your data before discussing your findings in an 10,000 words research thesis/report. It is thereby important that you learn to work independently and proactively, as it is your project and you are leading it. Hence, you must take ownership and manage it. You need to understand that the dissertation is solely YOUR responsibility, while your supervisor’s role is primarily to advise and share their expertise with you. Also, remember that the dissertation project helps you to develop skills such as proactivity, independent research skills and compiling work that is well presented and flows that are essential in your future career.
Learning Outcomes
At completion of the module, the students should be able to:
- Critically evaluate contemporary academic literature on a specific topic/area/problem to identify potential gaps in theoretical knowledge.
- Construct a research outline to develop a research proposal to facilitate data collection, analysis and critique discipline-specific knowledge informed by theoretical perspectives.
- Develop and justify a research instrument appropriate to the research aims and objectives.
- Synthesise marketing theory with contemporary professional practice to critically appraise data findings and deliver theoretical contributions to contemporary marketing theory.
- Formulate, evaluate and recommend solutions to real-world problems, contributing to theoretical knowledge in the subject area.
These learning outcomes are embedded in the framework of economic, social and environmental sustainability in accordance with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, and the Approved Module Specification.
Timetabled Classes
The module will be delivered as follows:
- A dissertation is first and foremost an independent research project, which means that you alone are responsible for your independent study work and, subsequently, the success and failure of your dissertation. While you are assigned a supervisor, his or her role is solely to advise you by sharing his/her research expertise with you. They will not run after you or hold your hand (= meaning doing the work with/for you). Furthermore, your supervisor will not read or even proofread any of your chapters. S/he, however, may look through parts of it during your supervisor meetings
- 6x 3-hour workshops/seminars, which are delivered in Week 20, 22, and 24 on each Monday 9.00-11.00 face to face, in Week 21, and 23 on each Tuesday 1.00 – 3.00 pm face to face. Additionally, in Week 25-26 and 30- 31, on each Thursday, 1.00 – 3.00 pm online via MS Teams. These workshops provide you with the foundational knowledge regarding, among others, literature review, research design, quantitative and qualitative research methods, and research ethics. The main purpose of these workshops is to facilitate students to complete the study then and there, progressing with each step of the study.
- 6x 2-hour lectures, which are delivered in Weeks 20-23 on each Monday from 14.00-16.00. These lectures cover research and library resources, appropriate referencing of sources according to the Harvard-DMU Referencing Style, issues relating to plagiarism and other academic offences, and available software to aid your research.
- 5 x 45-minute supervisor meetings, which you must arrange with your supervisor throughout your dissertation. This means that you are solely responsible for arranging the meeting. Your supervisor will not run after you. Please note that your supervisor is very busy and not just waiting for you to call. Thus, it is up to you to find a time for the meeting that suits not just you but also your supervisor. Further, your supervisor will only respond to a maximum of 15 email inquiries in total (excluding emails to schedule a meeting). Hence, use your email inquiries carefully!
Main Topic Areas
This postgraduate module is designed to provide extensive knowledge on literature review, problem identification and definition, research methods, data collection, analysis, and interpretation of findings to facilitate a scholarly outcome. Consequently, students will be able to produce an independent piece of work, in the form of a dissertation, and demonstrate their ability to conduct independent scholarly research, either to solve an issue or to explore an opportunity within their field of interest. The detailed topics that will be covered in the module are outlined in the provisional teaching plan.
Provisional Teaching Plan
Please note that the following schedule is provisional and may be subject to changes on a short-term notice.
|
Week |
L/S |
Description |
Remarks |
|
W1 AC20 |
L1 09th |
Introduction to the dissertation/research |
Review the students’ expectation Inform them of the significance and uniqueness of the |
|
|
Feb |
process |
module |
|
|
|
|
Introduce the research process |
|
|
S1 10th |
Selection of research area/topic |
Guide how background information should support the research topic/area. |
|
|
Feb |
|
Facilitate students to plan their studies |
|
Submission of tentative topics 16th Feb 2026 |
|||
|
W2 AC21 |
L2 16th |
Literature Review, research |
Guide for literature review Discuss how research questions and objectives are |
|
|
Feb |
questions/objectives, |
derived from the main research question and the |
|
|
|
hypotheses, and |
review of the literature |
|
|
|
conceptual framework |
Discuss how the conceptual framework is developed |
|
|
|
|
and derive (if needed) |
|
|
|
|
Develop the hypotheses accordingly (if needed) |
|
|
S2 |
Literature review, |
Facilitate students for literature review |
|
|
17thFeb |
research questions, |
Draft of the literature review |
|
|
|
objectives hypotheses, |
Facilitate the students to derive the research |
|
|
|
and conceptual |
questions, objectives,A hypotheses, and conceptual |
|
|
|
framework |
framework relevant to their studies |
|
|
|
|
Library session on literature search |
|
Assign supervisors 20th Feb 2026 |
|||
|
W3 AC22 |
L3 23rd |
Research Design |
How to design the research design for the study |
||
|
|
Feb |
|
|
||
|
|
S3 24rd |
Develop the research design |
Deciding the nature of the study – exploratory, descriptive and causal |
||
|
|
Feb |
|
Decide the time horizon, unit of analysis |
||
|
|
|
|
Decide the sampling process |
||
|
|
|
|
Library session for critical thinking and writing |
||
|
Submission of supervisor approved topics/idea 27th Feb 2026 |
|||||
|
W4 |
L4 |
Ethics approval process. |
Guideline for ethics and approval process |
||
|
AC23 |
2nd |
Questionnaire/interview |
Draft the questionnaire/interview protocol |
||
|
|
March |
protocol development |
|
||
|
|
S 4 3rd |
Ethics Application |
Facilitate students to make the ethics application (Deadline for the application 06th March) |
||
|
|
March |
|
|
||
|
W5 AC24 |
S 5 10th March |
Analytical approach |
Introduce the data analysis approaches – quantitative and qualitative research using SPSS and NVivo |
||
|
Obtain the ethics approval 18th March 2026 |
|||||
|
W6 AC25 |
S 6 19th |
Finalizing the introduction, literature and |
Discuss any issues in finalizing the introduction, literature and methodology Assist students with the |
||
|
Online |
March |
methodology |
checklist for the assignment (CW1) |
||
|
Submission of the Assignment 1 (CW1): Proposal: Introduction, Literature Review and Research Questions 23rd March 2026 |
|||||
|
W7 AC26 |
S 7 26th |
Data collection and analysis |
Discuss any issues in data collection and analysis and advise/facilitate the students |
||
|
Online |
March |
|
Guide students to plan out the analysis |
||
|
W8 AC30 |
S 8 23rd |
Discussion and Conclusion |
Guide the students to plan out their writing on the discussion and conclusion |
||
|
Online |
April |
|
|
||
|
W9 AC31 Online |
S 9 30th April |
Reflect on each step of the research process and discuss any concerns |
Discuss any issues/ concerns on research background, objectives/questions, literature view, research design, data collection, analysis, discussion and conclusion. Facilitate students with the checklist to submit a productive dissertation |
||
|
Submission of the dissertation (Assignment 2 – CW2) |
01st June 2026 |
|
|||
Using the VLE – Learning Zone (LZ)
Learning Zone is DMU’s new Virtual Learning Environment (VLE). It will be used to support your studies and allow you to engage with your learning material. If this is your first time using Learning Zone or you’re not sure how it works, please watch the playlist (Your Virtual Learning Environment – Overview (dmu.ac.uk)). It is recommended for your learning to access your module’s LZ shell/site through a browser where possible (i.e., on a PC or laptop), as it provides the optimal experience. However, for notifications, ease of access, and more, you can access your learning via the Brightspace Pulse App – available on Android and iOS (Your Virtual Learning Environment – Overview (dmu.ac.uk)). Once you have installed the App, simply search for De Montfort University and select it from the drop-down menu. You will then be prompted for your single sign-on information.
All important information relating to this module can be found on the module’s LZ site. This includes any information on the module, lecture notes and seminar materials, all announcements and communications, the module resource list as well as the procedure for submitting assessments via Turnitin. In addition, a digital version of the assessment brief will be posted on the LZ shell as well. Because all important announcements will be posted on this module’s LZ site, you are expected to check it at least once every single day.
Reading Resource List
Some recommended textbooks, monographs & edited books for the module and supporting your methodology:
- Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2021). Business Research: A Practical Guide for Students. Red Globe Press. (Essential)
- Naresh K Malhotra (2020) Marketing Research: as applied orientation, Pearson. (Recommended)
Further reading
- David Silverman (2021) Doing qualitative research, 6th edition, Sage.
- John W Creswell (2018) Research Design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches, 5th edition, Sage.
- Joseph F Hair; M J Page and Niek Brunsveld (2020) Essentials of Business Research Methods, 4th edition, Routledge.
- Emma Bell; Alan Bryman; Bill Harley (2019) Business research methods, 5th edition, Oxford University Press.
- M N K Saunders; Philip Lewis and Adrian Thornhill (2023) Research methods for business students, 9th edition, Pearson.
- Catherine Cassell and Gillian Symon (2011) Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, Sage.
- John F Schostak (2006) Interviewing and Representation in Qualitative Research, Open University Press.
- Palvi Eriksson and Anne Kovaleinen (2016) Qualitative methods in business research, Sage.
- William Foddy (1993) Constructing questions for interviews and questionnaire: theory and practice in social research. Cambridge University Press.
- Joseph F Hair; William C Black; Barry J Babin and Rolph E Anderson (2019) Multivariate data analysis, Cengage Learning EMEA.
- Hart, C. (1998) Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination, London: Sage.
- Robert K Yin (2014) Case study research: design and methods, 5th edition, Sage.
- Goulding, Christina (2005), “Grounded theory, Ethnography and Phenomenology: A Comparative Analysis of Three Qualitative Strategies for Marketing Research”, European Journal of Marketing, 39 (3-4), 294-308
- Thompson, Craig J. (1997), “Interpreting Consumers: A Hermeneutical Framework for Deriving Marketing Insights from the Texts of Consumers’ Consumption Stories”, Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (6), 438-455.
Important Academic Journals to Find Interesting and/or Relevant Papers for Your Research and Dissertation:
Journal of Marketing; Journal of Marketing Research; Journal of Consumer Research; Journal of Consumer Psychology; Journal of Academy of Marketing Science; Marketing Science; European Journal of Marketing; Consumption, Markets & Culture; Journal of Marketing Management; Journal of Business Research; International Journal of Research in Marketing; Advances in Consumer Research; European Advances in Consumer Research; Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research; Journal of Consumer Behaviour; International Journal of Consumer Studies; Journal of Customer Behaviour; Research in Consumer Behaviour; Australian Marketing Journal; Australasian Marketing Journal; etc. (Note: any relevant journal ranked in ABS or ADBC lists)
Besides academic journal articles, conference papers and books, however, you can cite and draw on broadsheet articles (i.e. The Guardian, The Times, Washington Post, etc.), trade magazines, company websites, official industry reports, specialist magazines, fact-based books and TV or film documentaries.
Please note: You must never cite, draw on or otherwise use blogs, tabloid articles (i.e. The Sun, Daily Mirror, Metro, etc.) and (unauthored) articles from unreliable sources and websites as your information sources! Use the DMU library sources instead of Google.
Flexible Rates Compatible With Everyone’s Budget
Hire a Professional Essay & Assignment Writer for completing your Academic Assessments
BMAP5005 Assessment
Assessment Overview
|
|
Assessment – Part 1(CW1) |
Assessment – Part 2 (CW2) |
|
Type |
Proposal: Introduction (brief), Literature Review and Research Questions |
Full Dissertation |
|
Length |
Approx. 2000 words (+/-10%) |
10,000 words (+/-10%) (including Literature Review) |
|
Weighting |
20% |
80% |
|
Deadline |
Friday 23rd March 2026 (noon, UK time) |
Friday 01st June 2026 (noon, UK time) |
|
Return date |
(tbc) |
(tbc) |
Key deadlines to be met by every student
|
Activity |
Deadline |
|
Submit your Research Topic Proposal Form in the LZ Submission Folder. |
· 16th Feb, 2026 @ midday (12 noon). |
|
Submit your supervisor approved research topic using Research Topic Approval Form in the LZ Submission Folder. |
· 27th Feb 2026 @ midday (12 noon). |
|
Last day to have your Ethics Application Form submitted on WorkTribe. |
· 06th March 2026 |
|
Last day to have your Ethics Application Form approved. Please note: Until your ethics application has been approved, you are not allowed to do any field (primary) research |
· 18th March 2026 |
|
Submission deadline for your Literature Review in the LZ Turnitin Submission Folder. (CW1) |
· 23rd March 2026 (midday, UK time) (LZ Submission Folder) |
|
Submission deadline for your full dissertation (CW2) |
· 01st June 2026 (midday, UK time) (LZ Submission Folder) |
Re-Sit and Deferral Attempt
Re-Sit
The students those who attempted a first sit and did not pass the final dissertation should revise and re-submit the original submission. They are NOT asked to choose a new subject area.
Those students should:
- Re-work their dissertation that originally submitted by taking into consideration the feedback that was given on the Learning Zone and via supervisor.
- Contact the supervisor for further guidance as soon as possible and commence working on it.
- Note that the improvements are on the shoulder of students’
responsibility and should take ownership of the work.
Deferral
The students who defer the submission under the official approval of the university should contact the supervisor who was originally assigned. Those students will work on the area that was originally discussed with the supervisor. If the students did not have an idea to start with, then of course, a new area needs to be identified for the dissertation.
However, the students should ensure to look at all the relevant information available on the Learning Zone at the module page.
Non-Anonymous Marking & Feedback
Due to its nature, the dissertation is subject to non-anonymous marking and will be assessed by a 1st marker and 2nd marker, who will mark your dissertation independently, compare their assessment and marks, and then agree on a final mark. The marked dissertation will be internally moderated and then forwarded to the external examiner from another university, who then provides a recommendation to the assessment board. Both markers will provide you with
written feedback in relation to the marks you have received for each criterion. Furthermore, in-text comments are provided as well. The general turnaround time at DMU is 15 working days from the submission date, which means that all weekends, bank holidays and all days on which the university is closed are excluded.
Academic Offences & Bad Academic Practice
These include but are not limited to plagiarism, cheating, contract cheating, exam cheating, collusion, copying work and reuse of your own work, poor referencing or the passing off of somebody else’s ideas as your own (as defined in Chapter 4 of the General Regulations and Procedures Affecting Students). As the assessment in this module is research-based, it is subject to block ethics approval obtained by the module leader and the ethics restrictions that come with it. Any departure from the outlined contextual limitations without the explicit approval of the module leader will be treated as Bad Academic Practice. If you are in any doubt about what constitutes an academic offence or bad academic practice, you must check with your module leader.
If you are suspected of committing an academic offence you will be called to a meeting with an Academic Practice Officer (APO). APOs are based within in each faculty and it is their role to advice on how to prevent bad academic practice and academic offences and to deal with serious cases. For further information, please see the webpages below:
Academic offences webpage Bad academic practice webpage
Important: Within the context of this module, any use of ChatGPT or any other AI tool will be treated as academic fraud!
Flexible Rates Compatible With Everyone’s Budget
Hire a writer to get plagiarism free assignment answers of this question
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your US, UK, Singapore college/ university Assignments.

