NURS761 Leadership and Research for Nursing Assessment Brief 2026 | Wintec

NURS761 Assessment Brief

To advance understanding of research and rangahau methods and concepts. To critically explore leadership practices in nursing and healthcare contexts.

LEARNING OUTCOMES

By the end of this course ākonga will be able to:

1. Critique rangahau, qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods research methodologies for nursing practice.
2. Critically appraise relevant research literature and evaluate ethical considerations pertaining to rangahau and research.
3. Apply and critically evaluate leadership, management, and educational strategies to promote hauora and interprofessional collaboration in nursing practice.
4. Evaluate the impact of research and leadership on enabling culturally responsive environments.
5. Critically appraise and integrate self-care frameworks in nursing practice for personal and professional resilience.

CRITERIA TO PASS THIS COURSE

The portfolio is comprised of multiple components. To pass this module, students must meet all learning outcomes and gain a minimum mark of 50% in each component.

REQUIRED RESOURCES

An extended reading list will be supplied by the academic staff member at the commencement of the module. This will be updated annually

GENERAL INFORMATION

Please take note of the following information and refer to the Programme Handbook for further information relevant to your study with us.

LEARNING DELIVERY

This course delivers face-to-face Lectures and tutorials, as well as self-directed learning activities outside of the classroom, such as extra readings, research, preparing for assessments, and online activities.

ATTENDANCE

It is the expectation that you attend and participate in all classes (lectures and tutorials). Missing classes reduces the likelihood for success. The Bachelor of Nursing programme is an applied academic degree which includes the requirement that students demonstrate professional practice in a range of ways. This includes required attendance and participation in theory classes and practical sessions. If you do have to miss a tutorial or other time during a semester, please advise your module coordinator in advance wherever possible. It is your responsibility to complete the missed module work as organised with the module co-ordinator.

Registered nurse scope of practice

Tapuhi kua rēhitatia Registered nurses in Aotearoa New Zealand incorporate knowledge, concepts and worldviews of both tangata whenua and tangata tiriti into practice. Registered nurses uphold and enact ngā mātāpono – principles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi, based on the Kawa Whakaruruhau framework and cultural safety, promoting equity, inclusion, diversity, and rights of Māori as tangata whenua. These concepts also relate to Pacific peoples and all population groups to support quality services that are culturally safe and responsive. Registered nurses are accountable and responsible for their nursing practice, ensuring that all health care provided is consistent with their education, assessed competence, relevant legislative requirements, and is guided by the Nursing Council of New Zealand’s standards for registered nurses.

Registered nurses use substantial scientific and nursing knowledge to inform comprehensive assessments, determine health needs, develop differential diagnoses, plan care and determine appropriate interventions. Interventions are evaluated to assess care outcomes based on clinical judgement and scientific and professional knowledge. Registered nurses practise independently and in collaboration with individuals, their whānau, communities, and the interprofessional healthcare team, to deliver equitable person/whānau/ whakapapa-centred nursing care across the life span in all settings. Registered nurses may also use their expertise in areas and roles such as leadership, management, education, policy and research. Conditions may be placed on the scope of practice of some registered nurses, dependent on their qualifications and/or experience, limiting them to a specific area of practice. Nurses who have additional experience and have completed the required education will be authorised by the Council to prescribe some medicines within their area of practice and level of competence. Registered nurses are responsible and accountable for directing and delegating to members of the healthcare team.

Registered nurses provide support and guidance to enrolled nurses.

WĀTAKA  |  WEEKLY SCHEDULE

For updates and further details see Moodle, ask your kaiako| tutor, or refer to the Timetable page on the Wintec website: https://www.wintec.ac.nz/student-resources/timetable

NGĀ AROMATAWAI  |  ASSESSMENTS

ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE

 

To pass this module, students must meet all learning outcomes and gain a minimum mark of 50% in each component.

See the following pages for details and marking criteria for each assessment.

IMPORTANT ASSESSMENT INFORMATION

Please take note of the following information and refer to the Programme Handbook for further assessment policies and procedures.

USING AI TOOLS

The purpose of assessment is for you to show us what you know or can do in relation to the course requirements. If you use AI (or any other person or thing) to do the ‘knowing’ or ‘doing’ for you, we can’t tell if you’ve done the required learning yourself.

Using others (i.e. AI tools or any other person or thing) to replace your own work, outside of the bounds set in the assessment instructions, is seen as “Inappropriate use” and may be subject to Academic Misconduct policies and procedures.

Please check the assessment instructions to learn how you are allowed, or not allowed, to use AI tools in each of your assessments.

Please refer to the AI Literacy Toolbox (under the ‘Resources’ menu in Moodle) to learn about using AI can during your studies.

AI USE DECLARATION

You are required to submit an AI Use Declaration with every assessment (unless otherwise instructed). We reserve the right to withhold marks until the declaration is submitted.

You can access the AI Use Declaration in the ‘Using AI Tools’ menu in Moodle.

ASSESSMENT CONCESSIONS

EVENTS DO NOT ALWAYS RUN SMOOTHLY, AND STUDENTS ARE EXPECTED TO TAKE THIS INTO

ACCOUNT WHEN MANAGING THEIR STUDY BY BUILDING IN CONTINGENCY FOR THE UNEXPECTED. FOR EXAMPLE, BY ENSURING THAT ASSIGNMENTS ARE COMPLETED IN GOOD TIME, OR ALLOWING SUFFICIENT TIME TO REVISE FOR AN EXAM.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS

WINTEC WILL, HOWEVER, TAKE ACCOUNT OF GENUINELY SERIOUS PROBLEMS OR EXCEPTIONAL

CIRCUMSTANCES BEYOND THE CONTROL OF A STUDENT WHICH HAVE ADVERSELY AFFECTED

THEIR PERFORMANCE IN AN INTERNAL ASSESSMENT, TEST, OR EXAMINATION. A STUDENT MAY

ASK FOR THEIR CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE CONSIDERED BY APPLYING FOR SPECIAL

CONSIDERATION FOR IMPAIRED PERFORMANCE OR FAILURE TO MEET ASSESSMENT DATES.

IT IS THE STUDENT’S RESPONSIBILITY TO APPLY FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION. APPLICATIONS

FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 5 WORKING DAYS OF THE ILLNESS/INCIDENT, BE COMPLETED IN FULL, AND INCLUDE ALL REQUIRED SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND EVIDENCE.

PLEASE REFER TO THE WINTEC ACADEMIC REGULATIONS APPENDIX FIVE: ASSESSMENT

CONCESSIONS FOR FURTHER DETAILS ABOUT EVIDENCE REQUIRED. YOU CAN FIND THE APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION FORM ON THE WINTEC WEBSITE, OR FROM THE STUDENT ENROLMENT AND INFORMATION CENTRE.

Hire a Professional Essay & Assignment Writer for completing your Academic Assessments

Flexible Rates Compatible With Everyone’s Budget

Order Now

NURS761 Assessment 1 Brief

Assessment Schedule

Arahitanga me te Rangahau mo te Mahi Tapuhi  / Leadership and Research for Nursing

Aromatawai Tuatahi | Assessment 1 – Outline

Task

Part A

You will write a focused literature review (approx. 500 words) on one New Zealand relevant nursing question. Your job is to show you can find good evidence, critically appraise it, combine into a coherent argument, and evaluate the ethical considerations that shape rangahau and research in Aotearoa.

Part B

You will write a research methods essay that critiques qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods options for your chosen nursing question. You are not being asked to write an ethics application here and you are not being asked to redo your literature review.

• Weighting: 60% overall
• Word count: 1500 words (plus or minus 10%, excluding reference list)
• Pass mark: 50%
• Learning outcome assessed: LO1 Critique rangahau, qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods research methodologies for nursing practice. LO2 Critically appraise relevant research literature and evaluate ethical considerations pertaining to rangahau and research
• Submission: Word document, APA 7th referencing

Ai Tool Use

The purpose of assessment is for you to show us what you know or can do in relation to the course requirements. If you use AI (or any other person or thing) to do the ‘knowing’ or ‘doing’ for you, we can’t tell if you’ve done the required learning yourself.

Using others (i.e. AI tools or any other person or thing) to replace your own work, outside of the bounds set in the assessment instructions, is seen as “Inappropriate use” and may be subject to Academic Misconduct policies and procedures.

Please check the assessment instructions to learn how you are allowed, or not allowed, to use AI tools in each of your assessments.

Please refer to the AI Literacy Toolbox (under the ‘Resources’ menu in Moodle) to learn about using AI can during your studies.

Task Details / Instructions / Steps / Guidelines

Assessment 1 Part A: literature Review(500 Words)

What You Are Doing And Why

You will write a focused literature review (approx. 500 words) on one New Zealand relevant nursing question. Your job is to show you can find good evidence, critically appraise it, combine into a coherent argument, and evaluate the ethical considerations that shape rangahau and research in Aotearoa. The literature review is not an annotated bibliography, and it is not a copy and paste parade of quotes. Then, using this literature review, you will write a research methods essay (approx. 1000 words) that critiques qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches for your chosen nursing question. You are not being asked to write an ethics application here. You are being asked to think like a researcher and justify a design that fits the question, context, and reality of nursing practice in Aotearoa. Both Parts A and B must be attempted.

1. How does nurse led triage in NZ emergency departments affect waiting time equity for Māori and Pacific peoples, and what outcomes should services measure?
2. Which nursing interventions best support medication safety and adherence for older adults in community nursing in Aotearoa New Zealand?
3. How effective are kaupapa Māori or Māori-led models of rangahau in improving engagement and outcomes in mental health nursing services in NZ?
4. What are the impacts of nurse led chronic disease education (diabetes or COPD) in primary care on avoidable hospital admissions in NZ?
5. How do staffing ratios and skill mix on NZ medical wards relate to missed care and patient harm, and what nursing measures are most effective at mitigating harm?
6. How does digital health or telehealth nursing in NZ influence access for rural communities, and what barriers and facilitators should nursing leaders consider, address, and or implement?
7. What nursing approaches reduce seclusion and restraint use in NZ mental health inpatient settings, and how should effectiveness of these measures be evaluated?
8. How do culturally safe communication strategies (plain language, teach-back) influence patient health literacy and complaints in NZ nursing contexts?
9. Compare myocardial infarction diagnosis and mortality statistics by gender. What are some of the causes for disparity in care between genders and what interventions have been implemented to address this in Aotearoa?
10. What contributes to gender disparities in mental health access and treatment, and what are some effective interventions to address this?

Task Instructions (What To Include)

For the literature review

• A clear introduction that states your chosen question and why it matters in NZ nursing practice.
• A brief search strategy summary: databases used, key terms, limits (for example last 10 years), and inclusion or exclusion criteria.
• Critical appraisal of the key literature: comment on quality, limitations, and relevance to the NZ context (this does not have to be every source just your key ones, Academic, popular and scholarly).
• Synthesis: group findings into themes or patterns and build an argument, not a list. For instance, consider what these themes and patterns suggest for possible future research, or do they already provide a full picture of your identified problem.
• Ethical considerations for rangahau and research in Aotearoa: include culturally responsive practice, Te Tiriti obligations, and relevant ethics principles such as informed consent, privacy, power, and data stewardship.
• A conclusion that answers: what does the evidence suggest, what is uncertain, and what should nursing practice or future research do next?

Leading on from your conclusion of where future research could lead, focus your essay on one of the following

• Critique a qualitative approach: proposed design (for example kaupapa Māori, phenomenology, grounded theory), sampling, data collection, and what type of knowledge it produces for nursing practice.
• Critique a quantitative approach: proposed design (for example cross-sectional, cohort, RCT, audit), sampling, measurement, and what it can and cannot claim.
• Critique a mixed methods approach: proposed design (for example explanatory sequential), how integration would occur, and why it might add value.
• Then choose the single best approach for your question and defend it with tight reasoning, using evidence from the research-methods literature.
• Include a brief feasibility section: where in NZ the study could occur, who would be recruited, what data you would realistically obtain, and key risks to validity or trustworthiness.

Minimum Evidence Expectations

• Use at least 10 sources, with a minimum of 6 peer reviewed research articles and two popular sources.
• At least 3 sources should be clearly relevant to Aotearoa New Zealand or comparable settings (state why comparable if not NZ).
• Use high-quality sources (guidelines, systematic reviews, primary research) and show you can tell the difference between strong evidence and noise.
• You may choose to use any of the high-quality sources you found in your literature review to support your discussion of different forms of research.

Assessment 1 Part B: Research Essay (1000 Words)

• Word count: 1000 words (plus or minus 10%, excluding reference list)

What You Are Doing And Why

You will write a research methods essay that critiques qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods options for your chosen nursing question. You are not being asked to write an ethics application here and you are not being asked to redo your literature review. You are being asked to think like a researcher and justify a design that fits the question, context, and reality of nursing practice in Aotearoa.

Task Instructions

• Restate your chosen research question and define the key variables or concepts.
• Critique a qualitative approach: proposed design (for example kaupapa Māori, phenomenology, grounded theory), sampling, data collection, and what type of knowledge it produces for nursing practice.
• Critique a quantitative approach: proposed design (for example cross-sectional, cohort, RCT, audit), sampling, measurement, and what it can and cannot claim.
• Critique a mixed methods approach: proposed design (for example explanatory sequential), how integration would occur, and why it might add value.
• Choose the single best approach for your question and defend it with tight reasoning, using evidence from the research methods literature.
• Brief feasibility section: where in NZ the study could occur, who would be recruited, what data you would realistically obtain, and key risks to validity or trustworthiness.

Minimum Evidence Expectations

• Use at least 8 scholarly sources, including at least 4 research methods sources (texts or peerreviewed methods papers).
• You may reuse up to 3 high-value sources from your Literature Review, but the argument must be new and methods-focused.
• Avoid generic method descriptions. Show judgement and specificity.

NURS761 Assessment 1 – Marking Rubric

Hire a writer to get plagiarism free assignment answers of this question

Flexible Rates Compatible With Everyone’s Budget

Order Now

NURS761 Assessment 2 Brief

Assessment Schedule

Arahitanga me te Rangahau mo te Mahi Tapuhi  / Leadership and Research for Nursing

AROMATAWAI TUARUA  |  ASSESSMENT 2 – OUTLINE

TASK / AIM

This is your capstone essay for the paper. You will take a New Zealand nursing scenario and critically evaluate leadership, management, and education strategies that promote hauora and interprofessional collaboration.

CONDITIONS

• Weighting: 40%
• Word count: 1000 words (plus or minus 10%, excluding reference list)
• Pass mark: 50%
• Learning outcomes assessed: LO3, LO4, LO5 only
• Submission: Word document, APA 7th referencing

AI TOOL USE

You are   NOT ALLOWED to use AI tools for any part of this assessment.

This includes using AI tools for research or writing purposes. Please read the instructions for an explanation of why AI tools have been deemed inappropriate.

NOTE: Any AI contribution reliably detected in your submission will be treated as “Inappropriate use”.

TASK DETAILS / INSTRUCTIONS / STEPS / GUIDELINES

WHAT YOU ARE DOING AND WHY

This is your capstone essay for the paper. You will take a New Zealand nursing scenario and critically evaluate leadership, management, and education strategies that promote hauora and interprofessional collaboration. You will also evaluate how research and leadership enable culturally responsive environments, and you will integrate a self-care framework for personal and professional resilience. In plain terms, you are showing you can lead without burning out, and you can lead in a way that actually fits Aotearoa.

CHOOSE ONE QUESTION

11. Leading safer care: You are the charge nurse in a NZ medical ward with rising falls and medication incidents. Critically evaluate leadership and education strategies to improve hauora and interprofessional teamwork, and explain how culturally responsive practice will be enabled. Integrate a self-care framework for sustained resilience in the team and yourself.
12. Primary care pressure: You are leading a NZ primary care nursing team to reduce avoidable admissions for people with diabetes. Evaluate leadership strategies, interprofessional collaboration, and how you will use research evidence to create a culturally responsive environment for Māori and Pacific peoples. Integrate a self-care framework to prevent moral distress and burnout.
13. Mental health leadership: You are part of a NZ inpatient mental health service aiming to reduce seclusion and restraint. Evaluate leadership and educational strategies that support the change with interprofessional collaboration, and discuss how research and leadership can strengthen a culturally responsive, trauma-informed environment. Integrate a self-care framework for resilience.
14. Rural inequity: You are leading a NZ community nursing service covering rural areas with limited access to GPs and transport. Evaluate leadership and management strategies that improve access and collaboration across services, and explain how you will enable culturally responsive practice using evidence. Integrate a self-care framework that fits shift work and community practice.
15. ED reality: You are leading a multidisciplinary initiative to improve pain management and communication in a NZ emergency department with high complaint rates. Evaluate leadership, management, and educational strategies to promote hauora and interprofessional collaboration. Evaluate the impact of research and leadership on cultural responsiveness. Integrate a self-care framework.
16. Aged care workforce: You are a clinical nurse educator in a NZ residential aged care facility with high staff turnover and missed care. Evaluate education and leadership strategies that promote hauora and teamwork, and explain how research evidence can support culturally responsive environments for residents and whānau. Integrate a self-care framework for professional resilience.
17. Te Tiriti in action: You are leading a quality improvement project to strengthen cultural safety in a NZ surgical ward. Evaluate leadership and management strategies to promote hauora and collaboration, and assess how research and leadership enable culturally responsive environments. Integrate a self-care framework for the nursing workforce.
18. Digital nursing leadership: You are implementing a new e-triage or telehealth nursing service in NZ. Evaluate leadership strategies, interprofessional collaboration, and how you will use research evidence to ensure the environment remains culturally responsive and equitable. Integrate a selfcare framework for the team in a digital work setting.

TASK INSTRUCTIONS (WHAT TO INCLUDE)

• Define the practice problem and why it matters for hauora in Aotearoa (include the population and the setting).
• Leadership and management: justify at least two strategies (for example change management approach, clinical governance, coaching, education plan, audit and feedback).
• Interprofessional collaboration: specify how you will build teamwork across disciplines and services, and how you will know it is working.
• Culturally responsive environments: evaluate how your leadership choices and use of research evidence will enable cultural safety and responsiveness, including Te Tiriti aligned practice and reduction of inequity.
• Self-care framework: select one framework (for example Compassion Fatigue and job satisfaction, Te Whare Tapa Whā applied to staff wellbeing, mindfulness-based stress reduction, resilience frameworks) and critically appraise how you will apply it to yourself and your team.
• Use evidence throughout. You should be making a case, not writing a motivational poster.

MINIMUM EVIDENCE EXPECTATIONS

• Use at least 12 scholarly sources, including at least 6 peer-reviewed research articles and at least 2 NZ policy or guideline sources where relevant.
• Your evidence must include leadership or change management literature and culturally responsive practice literature.
• Quality matters. Choose evidence that would stand up in a professional discussion with senior clinicians.

 NURS761 ASSESSMENT 2 – MARKING RUBRIC

SUBMISSION

• Submit as a Word document with a title page including your name, student ID, word count, and chosen question number. (It is always best to write using a live document then download for submission)
• Use APA 7th referencing. Use headings to make your structure visible.
• Keep within the word count. Over by more than 10% will be penalised according to course policy.
• You are responsible for what you submit. If you upload the wrong file, that is still the file we can mark.
• Academic integrity applies. If you use AI tools, follow course rules and cite or acknowledge as required by your programme policy.

Take professional academic assistance & Get 100% Plagiarism free papers

Flexible Rates Compatible With Everyone’s Budget

Order Now