BSS035-2 Employability and The Future Workplace Assignment Brief 2026 | UOB
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your US, UK, Singapore college/ university Assignments.
| University | University of Bedfordshire (UOB) |
| Subject | BSS035-2 Employability and The Future Workplace |
BSS035-2 Assignment Brief
| Key assignment details | |
| Unit title & code | Employability and The Future Workplace BSS035-2 SEM 2 |
| Assignment number & title | 001 Employability Portfolio |
| Assignment type (including exams) | Portfolio |
| Weighting of assignment | 100% |
| Size or length of assessment or exam duration | Assessment Portfolio total 3000 words +/- 10% |
| Use of generative AI | Permitted for research but must be used according to the University Policy and referenced |
| Use of self-plagiarism | Not permitted |
| Understanding the assignment brief | |
| Assignment brief to be discussed during an in-class session with students within the first 2 weeks of the unit. | 19/01/2026
Week commencing – Week 2 of the semester teaching |
| Uploaded screen/podcast explaining the assessment, the rubric and marking criteria. | Enter link on the BREO shell TBC |
What am I required to do in this assignment?
What You Need to Do
You will create a portfolio of evidence that shows:
You understand what employers want from business graduates now and in the future that you can reflect on your own skills and development and that you are preparing for your future career, matching your skillset to match employer needs.
In your portfolio, you are expected to:
Demonstrate critical reflection on your development and learning using academic sources to support your work. Following the Harvard referencing style for citations and references to integrate theory with practice by linking your experiences to academic concepts, including employability connections to relevant UN Sustainable Development goals.
Your Submission:
Submit a Word document using the template provided.
The total word count should be 3,000 words (+/- 10%).
Use the appendices to include your evidence from your BREO journal
Evidence: (A checklist is provided)
– Weekly journal entries from BREO.
– Self-assessment tools (e.g. SWOT analysis, skills audits).
– Any other relevant documents (CV, LinkedIn, feedback, etc.).
You are encouraged to use AI tools for researching and sorting information. You must use a critical approach in using information this way and your use of AI must be referenced correctly.
Please do not use any 3rd party tools in the development of your assignment which changes the wording, like paraphrasing for you or translating into English. You are encouraged to complete drafts in your own words and use STUDIOSITY for feedback on structure, punctuation and grammar.
What do I need to do to pass? How do I achieve a good grade?
“What do I need to do pass?”. During the assessment introductory session, you should be given the opportunity to check your understanding of the threshold statements and what you need to do to surpass them.
You will produce a portfolio demonstrating your understanding of the employer needs of the workplace of the future, this might include evidence of technological developments, or the key skills and attributes required in individuals in the business environment. Your portfolio will show some reflection of your development in the unit including a minimum of 5 entries from the portfolio checklist. Your work will include some application of relevant theory.
The assessment marking criteria listed below show how your work is assessed. The assessment criteria are informed by the unit’s learning outcomes and the assessment task. Carefully reading the assessment criteria should help you understand the aspects that will be used to judge your progress and achievement of the learning outcomes and offer guidance on “how do I achieve a good grade”. You will receive feedback from your tutor as part of the assessment in Week 4. Otherwise informal feedback will be provided from time to time in class.
If you demonstrate understanding of the future requirements of employers and how you plan to align your skills and experience to keep up with those requirements, showing insight and analysis of your skill set and potential, extensively supported by relevant evidence and research correctly cited you should achieve a good grade in this unit.
How will my assignment be marked?
Your assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations (see the Unit Information Form uploaded on BREO) and the specific marking criteria below (marking rubric). Please read carefully as they will help you prepare and evaluate your own work before you submit.
They will also help you understand the grade and feedback received once marked.
|
|
70%+ (1st Class) |
60-69% (2:1) |
50-59% (2:2) |
40-49% (3rd Class) Threshold Standard |
30-39% (Fail) |
0-29% (Fail) |
|
20% Understanding of Employment Trends |
You clearly explain how the job market is changing and show insight using strong examples and analysis. |
Shows good understanding with relevant examples. |
You mention some trends like increase in tech skills but without much detail. |
Limited understanding. |
Shows some evidence of understanding but it is mostly not relevant and incorrect. |
No evidence of understanding demonstrated |
|
35% Reflection on Skills & Career Planning |
You reflect deeply on personal growth and career goals. |
You reflect well and show some insight into how you can improve your future career opportunities. |
Some reflection shown. You list skills but don’t connect them fully to your career goals. |
Limited reflection. You mention skills bit don’t explain how they link or matter to your future career goals. |
The work is descriptive and lacks any personal insight or focus on your career path planning. |
No evidence of evaluation or reflection on your knowledge, skills or attributes required by future employers |
|
25% Portfolio Entries & Presentation |
All entries included, well-organized, and professionally presented. |
Most entries included and clearly presented and structured. |
Some entries missing or underdeveloped. |
Minimum entries included. |
There are only a few entries evidenced from the checklist (4 entries or less) |
Poorly evidenced portfolio entries and poorly presented (1-2 entries) |
|
10% Use of Research & Referencing |
You show excellent use of academic and industry sources; all references in correct Harvard style. |
Good use of academic and industry sources with only minor errors. |
Some use of academic and industry sources; referencing inconsistent. |
Limited research and referencing. |
There is limited evidence of supporting research and incorrectly referenced |
Submission has no supporting research evidenced and is not referenced correctly |
|
10% Use of AI Tools in Research |
You clearly explain your use of AI tools and they are used appropriately and referenced. E.g., Notes using CoPilot or ChatGPT to brainstorm ideas and includes a reflection on its usefulness. |
AI tools used with some explanation. E.g., Mentions using AI like CoPilot for summarizing articles but lacks detail. |
AI tools mentioned but not clearly integrated. |
AI tools mentioned but not correctly referenced in all cases. |
AI content evident in reports but not explained or referenced. |
AI used without paraphrasing and not referenced |
Flexible Rates Compatible With Everyone’s Budget
Hire a Professional Essay & Assignment Writer for completing your Academic Assessments
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your US, UK, Singapore college/ university Assignments.
