Daniel’s style is easy to read—clean, direct, and confident. He’s the go-to for 7LD03 or 5HR02 units that demand both evidence and logic. Over 2,100 students trust him for assignments that actually sound like a person wrote them, not a robot.
During The Tenure Of Our Service Offering, We Have Delivered Lakhs Of Assignments, Essays And Dissertations And Have Gained Trust Of Our Customers, Which Can Be Seen By Our High Review Ratings Of 4.8 / 5 Stars.
I’ve been scared of plagiarism since last semester. Their work passed Turnitin and GPTZero without any edits. I received the draft early and used it to revise before my submission. Genuine help, not a shortcut.
My topic needed a deep jurisdiction comparison, and I didn’t know where to start. They sourced real judgments and suggested research gaps too. My supervisor approved the outline on the first attempt.
The difference between lease and license always confused me. Their heading structure matched my university format perfectly. What I liked most was the human tone—it never felt AI-written at all.
I used to memorize case names but didn’t know how to use them. The writer’s explanation felt human, not robotic. I could answer viva questions calmly for the first time.
I feared using AI tools because of detection risk. They delivered a fully original paper and even helped me understand Bluebook referencing. The draft was detailed but still easy to read. Best decision I made this semester.
I didn’t know how to make contract clauses realistic. The assignment looked like it was prepared by an actual law firm. That helped me understand commercial drafting methods clearly.
I was nervous about my viva because I couldn’t remember the difference between possession and ownership. They sent short notes with examples from UK and Singapore law. The examiner even said my reasoning was clear and practical.
They removed AI lines, fixed citations, and added real precedents. I finally understood how OSCOLA works in academic writing. It saved me from resubmission.
I couldn’t explain the transfer to an unborn person in a logical way. Their draft used real case law and made it look like I understood the doctrine. The referencing was so clean that I used it as a template for my other essays too.
I always feared problem questions, but the expert showed how to identify parties and connect statutes. It felt like a mini law lecture, not just a solution.
I kept mixing up different mortgage types, especially anomalous and usufructuary. My writer broke it down like an actual tutor. The conclusion section helped me score more than I expected—even my lecturer said the structure was solid.
The comparison between Amazon cases and EU regulations helped me present a strong argument. I never thought research could be written in such friendly language.
My draft had no structure. They reshaped it using ILAC and added UK vs US insolvency rules. The professor said it felt like a business law briefing. That compliment made my whole week.
Case laws always felt like a puzzle, but the writer broke them into small steps and even showed how judges apply logic. For the first time, I scored above 70% in commercial contract law.
I used to mix up contract law and tort duties. The expert created a simple comparison chart I could revise before the exam. I didn’t expect real academic clarity this fast
I couldn’t understand how tort law differs in the US/UK/Australia. The expert used charts, policy differences and case references. It felt like proper research, not filler content.
I’m terrible at presentations. They made a PPT with speaker notes, cases and visuals. I just spoke naturally, and the professor thought I researched everything.
My assignment needed workers’ compensation logic. They used an Indian Supreme Court case to break it down. It felt like sitting with a senior law tutor.
I had written 30 pages already but was stuck with structure and originality. The expert helped refine arguments, reduce plagiarism, and cite newer research from 2024–25 journals. I finally submitted my proposal with confidence and got approved.
I was scared of plagiarism after using AI tools earlier. This time I got a clean paper with OSCOLA citations and a proper structure. My grades actually improved—first time this semester.
I run a small student-led startup and needed an assignment on how IP laws protect new businesses. The expert included practical steps, documents, and real UAE laws. I used the same knowledge during a university event and got noticed by a mentor.
“I had only 48 hours before submission. The case explanation was detailed but still student-friendly. They even explained why the defendant ‘must’ pay damages despite no intention. My professor appreciated the clarity.
My marks always dropped due to wrong citations. This time, every footnote and bibliography entry was correct. Seeing the format helped me understand how OSCOLA really works—much better than any online tutorial or textbook.
Negligence was always confusing for me. The writer used a real-life hospital case to explain breach of duty, and suddenly IRAC started making sense. I could even answer follow-up questions in the viva.
