MNSC931 Whānau and Community Hauora Initial Assessment 1 Brief 2026 | Wintech
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your US, UK, Singapore college/ university Assignments.
| University | Waikato Institute of Technology (Wintec) |
| Subject | MNSC931 Whānau and Community Hauora |
MNSC931 Initial Assessment 1 Brief
| Title | Community assessment and development of a researchable question | Total Possible Mark | 100 |
| Type | 30-minute presentation and peer feedback x 3 | Weighting | 40% |
| Learning Outcome(s) | 1. Critically analyse the contemporary models and approaches of care that influence hauora in your practice setting through a community inquiry lens.
2. Deconstruct the social, cultural, economic, environmental and political factors that influence specific populations’ capacities for maintaining, restoring and improving hauora. |
||
Assessment Task
This assessment enables you to:
- Identify the health needs of a particular community or population with attention to the influences on hauora, opportunities for health promotion and inter-professional collaboration.
- Review related literature to identify the background and possible gaps in research. Include succinct details on the importance of the review and the reason for conducting it in the context of what is already known.
- Develop an answerable review question using the PCC format.
- Provide detailed notes to support your presentation that are suitable to accompany the presentation.
- Constructively feedback in support of three peer research presentations within one week.
CONDITIONS
- Work with a supervisor to develop your ideas
- 30-minute recorded presentation (+/- 5 minutes)
- Include a written account to support the presentation (1000 words)
- 7th edition APA style referencing used consistently
- Feedback to three other students’ presentations (150-200 words)
AI TOOL USE
You are ✘ NOT ALLOWED to use AI tools for any part of this assessment.
This includes using AI tools for research or writing purposes. Please read the instructions for an explanation of why AI tools have been deemed inappropriate.
NOTE: Any AI contribution reliably detected in your submission will be treated as “Inappropriate use”.
MNSC931 Initial Assessment 1 Marking Rubric
| Total possible mark: [Insert total possible mark] |
Exemplary (A range) |
Proficient (B range) |
Acceptable (C range) |
Needs Improvement (D-E range) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significance, context and justification of research including research question are included and justified | Explication of background and significance of research problem is comprehensive. Robust justification of possible research project in accordance with background readings and community priorities. | Explication of background and significance of research problem is credible. Justification of possible research project in accordance with background readings and community priorities | Explication of background and significance of research problem is outlined. Background readings and community priorities are mentioned. Research question is connected to background. | Research significance and background is weakly argued and lacks link to background readings and community priorities. Research question is poorly worded or insufficiently supported and disconnected from background. |
| 55 | ||||
| Scholarship is evident throughout in presentation, writing style, referencing and format and focus. | Sophisticated, professional approach that is logical and informative, clear focus, accurate referencing, well presented. | Logical flow, well developed professional presentation, clear focus minor errors in referencing. | Logical flow impaired in places. Presenting style needs refinement, multiple referencing errors. Loses focus at times. | Poorly developed presentation, lacks logical flow, significant referencing errors, misunderstands the intention of presentation. |
| 30 | ||||
| Feedback to peers | Provides excellent constructive written feedback to three peers within timeframe. | Provides good written feedback to three peers within timeframe. | Provides some thoughtful written feedback to three peers within timeframe. | Provides written feedback to three peers but lacks support and thought, outside time limit. |
| 15 | ||||
| 100 |
Master of Nursing Science (Pre-registration) (240 credits)
| Module
Code |
Module Name | Level | Credits | Pre-
Requisites |
Co-
Requisites |
| HEAL811 | Ngā Momo Mōhiotanga: Ways of
Knowing – Foundations for Professional Practice |
8 | 30 | ||
| MNSC812 | Health Assessment, Pathophysiology and
Pharmacology for Professional Practice |
8 | 30 | HEAL811 | |
| MNSC821 | Re-establishing Hauora | 8 | 30 | MNSC812
Heal811 |
MNSC822 |
| MNSC822 | Clinical Practicum 1 – Re-establishing
Hauora |
8 | 30 | MNSC812
HEAL811 |
MNSC821 |
| MNSC931 | Whānau and Community Hauora | 9 | 30 | MNSC821
MNSC 822 |
MNSC832 |
| MNSC832 | Clinical Practicum 2 – Whānau and
Community Hauora |
8 | 30 | MNSC822
MNSC821 |
MNSC931 |
| HEAL941 | Rangahau or Research as Evidence for
Practice |
9 | 15 | MNSC931
MNSC832 |
MNSC842 |
| MNSC842 | Clinical Practicum 3 – Toia Mai | 8 | 45 | MNSC842 | HEAL941 |
Complete Your Waikato Institute of Technology Assignments With Students Assignment Help
Flexible Rates Compatible With Everyone’s Budget
Hire a Professional Essay & Assignment Writer for completing your Academic Assessments
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your US, UK, Singapore college/ university Assignments.
