NCO201 Learn to Learn, Learn for Life Tutor-Marked Assignment 1, 2026 | SUSS
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your US, UK, Singapore college/ university Assignments.
| University | Singapore University of Social Science (SUSS) |
| Subject | NCO201 Learn to Learn Learn for Life |
NCO201 Tutor-Marked Assignment 1
This individual assignment is worth 60% of the final mark forNCO201 Learn to Learn, Learn for Life.
The deadline for this assignment is:
| TG 01-07 (Full-time undergraduate) | Sun, 29 March 2026, 12 P.M. (end of Week 11) |
| T 01-23 (Part-time undergraduate) | Sun, 29 March 2026, 12 P.M. (end of Week 11) |
Note to Students
- Use the TMA01 Submission Template to complete this assignment located on the L/LG page. Do not change the template formatting.
- You are to include the following particulars in your submission: Your Name, SUSS PI No., and Submission Date.
- Academic dishonesty will be penalised. Your answer to this assignment should be your original work, and no parts of it should come from other sources without proper references. In addition, you are not allowed to resubmit work that you have submitted for other courses or a previous enrolment of this course. The University has strict guidelines and will enforce severe penalties for direct and unacknowledged copying of course materials or the work of any other authors. Please refer to the Student Handbook for more details regarding plagiarism.
- You are required to keep copies of earlier drafts and work to use as evidence of original work.
- If you use AI tools (QuillBot, ChatGPT, Grammarly, etc), please use the following table to declare your AI usage as an appendix at the end of your submission. Failure to do so can result in a failing mark for plagiarism.
| Prompt | Full Output | Output Used in Final Submission |
- Your assignment will be uploaded onto Canvas assignments and passed through Turnitin to scan for plagiarism and AI use.
- You are strongly encouraged to submit your assignments before the specified deadline. 10 marks will automatically be deducted via the grade-book system for each 24-hour block. There is strictly no extension of assignment deadlines. Please refer to the Student Handbook for more details.
Metacognition and Mindset at Work
Being competent at metacognition means you
- understand how learning occurs,
- are aware of your personal strengths and weaknesses as a learner, and
- know how to identify what resources and strategies you need to become a better learner based on your strengths and weaknesses
Having a growth mindset can help you
- take on challenges,
- learn from criticism, and
- bounce back from setbacks in your learning journey
Being aware of your metacognitive competency and mindset can help you identify strengths you can leverage as well as areas that need support so that you can make deliberate decisions about how to approach both your learning and unexpected situations.
This assignment has two parts.
Part I: Learner Profile (By Week 5)
Your learner profile provides a snapshot of where you are at the beginning of this course. It helps you take stock of your individual strengths and weaknesses so that you can be intentional about growing as a self-directed learner. For this part, keep in mind that you are not being marked on your current metacognitive competency or mindset. Rather, you are being assessed for your awareness and insights.
Complete the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) and Mindset Questionnaire on the L/LG-page under “Modules”. Answer each questionnaire honestly for the most accurate assessment.
i. Download and complete the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI).
ii. Select one strength and one weakness from the MAI questionnaire based on the spreadsheet calculation.
iii. Download and complete the Mindset Questionnaire.
iv. Select one strength and one weakness from the Mindset questionnaire based on the spreadsheet calculation.
Use the following table to compile your results. Use the highest and lowest proportional scores as your respective strengths and weaknesses.
| Metacognitive Competency | Score | Total | Choose 1 Strength
(Mark with an X) |
Choose 1
Weakness (Mark with an X) |
| Declarative Knowledge | 8 | |||
| Procedural Knowledge | 4 | |||
| Conditional Knowledge | 5 | |||
| Planning | 7 | |||
| Information Management | 10 | |||
| Comprehension Monitoring | 7 | |||
| Debugging Strategies | 5 | |||
| Evaluation | 6 | |||
| Mindset | Score | Total | Choose 1
Strength (Mark with an X) |
Choose 1
Weakness (Mark with an X) |
| Attitude toward Intelligence and Abilities | 54 | |||
| Attitude toward Challenges and Effort | 66 | |||
| Ability to Process and
Evaluate Criticism |
30 | |||
| Attitude toward Mistakes | 36 | |||
| Overall Mindset Score | 186 |
- Explain how the:
metacognitive strength and mindset strength identified in the table above are likely to help you achieve your learning goal? Give reasons and examples to support your explanation.
metacognitive weakness and mindset weakness identified in the table above may hinder your ability to achieve your goal? Give reasons and examples to support your explanation.
(20 marks)
- Identify one strategy that can strengthen ONE weakness in the context of achieving this goal and explain how you would use it.
(10 marks)
Part II: Learning Experience (Weeks 5–10)
Self-reflection is a critical part of learning.
Certain strategies, resources, and/or approaches may not have yielded the results you expected in this instance. Unforeseen challenges and/or setbacks may have impeded your progress. Or, you may have been surprised by what you accomplished!
As we reflect on our learning experience, we should try to understand why some parts of our plan worked better than others and gain insight into our strengths and weaknesses as learners.
Your insights and reflections can help you develop a lifelong practice of making more informed choices and improving your learning strategies.
- Analyse three key insights that you have discovered about the way you learn in this reflection. Support your insights with reasons and examples to show how/why they are significant to you.
In your reflection, you may link your insights to any of the components below. You may also choose other learning concepts you have learnt in class or from secondary sources:
- What did you learn about your ability to anticipate problems/areas in need of support and devise strategies to address them beforehand?
- What did you learn about your ability to keep an eye on your progress and adapt your plan along the way?
- Self-regulation. What did you learn about how you tackle setbacks, problems, or unexpected challenges?
- Social-relational learning. What did you learn about the kind of relational support that works well / does not work well for you?
- Ethical learning. What did you learn about the values involved in learning? This can include character values, principles, or ways that we contribute to our learning communities.
- How has your impression of yourself as a learner and/or learning changed through this learning experience? OR, what is one thing you would do differently the next time you learn something new? Why?
(60 marks)
Other Graded Components
- Appropriate References: Cite all sources, including AI content, using APA format to acknowledge where you have used other people’s ideas to support or substantiate your claims. The reference section is not included in the page count.
- Documentation of progress: Provide photos or screen shots of your learning in progress in the appendix of the TMA01 assignment template.
(10 marks)
Notes for Students
- Use the TMA01 Submission Template. Do not modify the formatting.
Arial, 12-point font size
Double-spaced text (only the Learning Plan table may be in single line spacing)
Margins:
- Top and bottom = 2.54 cm
- Left and right = 2.54 cm
Suggested length: 5-7 pages. Content beyond the 7-page limit will not be marked.
Any changes to the formatting will be penalised.
- Not included in the page count:
Cover page
Reference section
Appendix of your MAI and Mindset table
Appendix of your PCT01
- Use the APA referencing format for in-text citations and the reference section. Cite all sources including course materials.
References
You may use the following articles, readings from the in-class activities, or any of your own sources in your submission:
Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
Conerty, J. J. (2022). Review of Making school relevant with individualized learning plans: Helping students create their own career and life goals. Education Review, 29. https://doi.org/10.14507/er.v29.3369
Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481–496.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618804166
Gargallo-López, B., Almerich-Cerveró, G., García-García, F.-J., López-Francés, I., & Sahuquillo-Mateo, P.-M. (2023). University student profiles in the learning to learn competence and their relationship with academic achievement. Revista
Española de Pedagogía, 81(286), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP81-32023-02
Kivunja, C. (2015). Teaching students to learn and to work well with 21st century skills:
Unpacking the career and life skills domain of the new learning paradigm.
International Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 1–11. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1060566
Rege, M., Hanselman, P., Solli, I. F., Dweck, C. S., Ludvigsen, S., Bettinger, E., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., Walton, G., Duckworth, A., & Yeager, D. S. (2021). How can we inspire nations of learners? An investigation of growth mindset and challenge-seeking in two countries. American Psychologist, 76(5), 755–767.
https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000647
Robinson, J. D., & Persky, A. M. (2020). Developing self-directed learners. American
Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(3), 512–520. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe847512
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Flexible Rates Compatible With Everyone’s Budget
Hire a Professional Essay & Assignment Writer for completing your Academic Assessments
NCO201 TMA 01 Grading
The assignment will be marked based on the rubric below:
| Criteria | Demonstrates mastery
(80%–100%) |
Demonstrates competence
(65%–79%) |
Demonstrates abilities in
development (50%–64%) |
Key areas in need of
improvement (40%–49%) |
Lacking major components
(<40%) |
| PART I: Demonstrates student’s metacognitive competency and mindset strengths and weaknesses (max. 20 marks) | Defines strengths and
weaknesses. Explains reasons why strengths can help student achieve learning goal and why weaknesses may hinder student from achieving learning goal, based on relevant personal examples.
(16–20 marks) |
Defines strengths and weaknesses.
Describes how strengths can help student achieve learning goal and how weaknesses may hinder student from achieving learning goal through relevant examples.
(13–15 marks) |
Outlines strengths and weaknesses. Mentions how strengths can
help student achieve learning goal and how weaknesses may hinder student from achieving learning goal.
(10–12 marks) |
Sketches strengths and
weaknesses but examples used are not relevant to the learning goal.
(8–9 marks) |
Sketches strengths and
weaknesses but examples are incomplete or incomprehensible.
(0–7 marks) |
| PART I: Describes and explains potential strategy to improve one weakness (max. 10 marks) | Identifies a relevant
strategy that could address the student’s weakness and aid in learning goal journey. Explains the steps for applying the strategy with specific examples. Forecasts the expected outcome of the strategy.
(8–10 marks) |
Identifies a relevant
strategy that could address the student’s weakness and aid in learning goal journey. Explains the steps for how to apply it with brief examples.
(7 marks) |
Identifies a strategy that
could address the student’s weakness. Link to learning goal may be unclear. Steps for application may be unclear. May be missing examples.
(5–6 marks) |
Describes features of
strategy that could address student’s weakness but does not explain how to apply it.
(4 marks) |
Identifies an inappropriate or
irrelevant strategy that will not aid in developing the student’s weakness.
(0–3 marks) |
| PART II:
Offers insights (max. 60 marks) |
Identifies and analyses three
personal and specific insights.
All insights are supported by analysis that explains why |
Identifies and describes three relevant
insights.
|
Identifies three generic insights
OR missing one insight.
Insights are supported by examples, but at least one |
Identifies two insights that are confusing or
irrelevant OR offers only one insight.
Insights are supported by brief examples, but they do not |
Insights are confusing or
irrelevant.
Insight is supported by convoluted example(s).
|
| they are
significant, with concrete examples.
Explains how insights affect their learning process and their effectiveness as a learner.
Discusses how the insight helped them modify their learning approach.
(48–60 marks) |
All insights are supported by clear examples but reasons why insights are significant are only implied in examples.
Describes how insights affect their learning process and their effectiveness as a learner.
May describe how insight helped them modify their learning approach
(39–47 marks) |
example does
not explain why the insight is significant.
Describes how 1-2 insights affect their learning process and their effectiveness as a learner.
(30–38 marks) |
explain why the insights were
insignificant.
Describes how one insight affects their learning process and their effectiveness as a learner.
(24–29 marks) |
No or incomprehensible link to learning competency
and/or learning concept.
(0–23 marks) |
|
| Citations (max. 10 marks) | Cites at least three relevant
peer-reviewed sources and critically engages with at least one to deepen / extend reflection (e.g. by analysing, questioning, or applying key insights to their own reflection).
Provides documentation of learning in progress.
|
Cites at least three relevant
peer-reviewed sources, with some engagement (e.g. only engages them to confirm student’s claims or to provide definitions).
Provides documentation of learning in progress.
|
Cites at least two relevant
peer-reviewed sources without significant engagement.
May have minor errors in source citation.
Provides documentation of learning in progress.
|
Cites at least one relevant
peer-reviewed source without significant engagement
May provide incomplete source citation.
Missing or incomplete documentation of learning in progress.
|
Does not use sources or uses unreliable / irrelevant
sources.
May provide incomplete or incorrect source citation.
Missing documentation of learning in progress.
Submissions that are discovered not to have declared AI use and/or are translated wholesale from another language using |
|
(8–10 marks) |
(7 marks) |
(5–6 marks) |
(4 marks) |
AI will receive no more than 2 marks.
(0–3 marks) |
—— END OF ASSIGNMENT ——
Flexible Rates Compatible With Everyone’s Budget
Hire a writer to get plagiarism free assignment answers of this question
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your US, UK, Singapore college/ university Assignments.

