DFI5006 Applied Research Skills Assignment Brief 2026 | Arden University
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your US, UK, Singapore college/ university Assignments.
| University | Arden University |
| Subject | DFI5006 Applied Research Skills |
DFI5006 Assignment Brief
As part of the formal assessment for the programme you are required to submit a Applied Research Skills assignment. Please refer to your Student Handbook for full details of the programme assessment scheme and general information on preparing and submitting assignments.
Learning Outcomes:
After completing the module, you should be able to:
1. Critically appraise the validity and reliability of quantitative and qualitative approaches within a research project
2. Identify and critically appraise quantitative methods and their application, and select those appropriate to specified project scenarios
3. Use a range of quantitative analysis methods to summarise and analyse quantitative data
4. Demonstrate an ability to define a data requirement, collect, manage and prepare quantitative data
Guidance
Your assignment should include: a title page containing your student number, the module name, the submission deadline and the exact word count of your submitted document; the appendices if relevant; and a reference list in (see referencing section for more information). You should address all the elements of the assignment task listed below.
Please note thattutors will use the assessment criteria set out below in assessing your work.You must not include your name in your submission because Arden University operates anonymous marking, which means that markers should not be aware of the identity of the student. However, please do not forget to include your STU number.
Maximum word count: 1500 words
Please refer to the full word count policy which can be found in the Student Policies section here: Arden University | Regulatory Framework. Please note the following:Students are required to indicate the exact word count on the title page of the assessment.
The word count includes everything in the main body of the assessment (including in textcitations and references). The word count excludes numerical data in tables ,figures,diagrams, footnotes, reference list and appendices.
ALL other printed words ARE included in the word count.
Buy Answer of DFI5006 Applied Research Skills
Assignment Task
Instructions
You are required to read the paper“Analysis and investigation of the next commodity Supercycle in gold,silver, and copper” saved as an attachment.
Once you have read the paper you are required to:
a)Examine the research problem and analyse the research objectives as stated by the author.(30 marks)
b)Critically appraise key aspects of the literature review, identifying key themes.(30 marks)
c)Discuss the chosen methodology and comment on the findings. Note any areas thatcould have been strengthened, for example using alternative data set, research design or methodological approaches.(40 marks)(1,500 Words)(100 Marks)(LOs: 1 and 2)
DFI5006 Assessment Criteria (Learning objectives covered
| Grade | Mark Bands | Generic Assessment Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| First (1) | 80%+ | An outstanding information base exploring and analysing the discipline, its theory and any associated ethical considerations. There is sophisticated use and management of learning resources, and a high degree of autonomy is demonstrated. Writing is outstandingly well structured and accurate, with originality and professional skills demonstrated. The work is original and with some additional effort could be considered for internal publication. |
| First (1) | 70–79% | An excellent knowledge base within which the discipline is explored and analysed. There is a degree of originality in the approach. The work demonstrates confidence and autonomy and extends to consider ethical issues. Learning resources have been managed confidently. Writing is exceptionally well structured and accurately referenced throughout. Where appropriate, an excellent level of professional skills is demonstrated, and the work demonstrates a high level of intellectual and academic skills. |
| Upper Second (2:1) | 60–69% | A very good knowledge base which explores and analyses the discipline, its theory, and any associated ethical issues. There is evidence of some originality and independence of thought. A very good range of learning resources underpin the work and there is evidence of growing confidence and self-direction. The work demonstrates the ability to analyse the subject and apply theory with good academic and intellectual skills. Academic writing skills are very good, expression is accurate overall, and the work is consistently referenced throughout. |
| Lower Second (2:2) | 50–59% | A good understanding of the discipline which begins to analyse the subject and apply some underpinning theory. There may be reference to some of the ethical considerations. The work shows a sound level of competence in managing basic sources and materials. Academic writing skills are good and accurate overall, and the work is planned and structured with some thought. Professional skills are good where appropriate. The work lacks original thought, but academic and intellectual skills are moving into the critical domain. The work is referenced throughout. |
| Third (3) | 40–49% | Satisfactory level of performance in which there are some omissions in understanding the subject, its underpinning theory, and ethical considerations. There is little evidence of independent thought, and the work shows a basic use of source and materials. Academic and intellectual skills are limited. There are some difficulties in developing professional skills where appropriate. Referencing may be inconsistent. |
| Marginal Fail | 30-39% | A limited piece of work in which there are clear gaps in understanding the subject, its underpinning theory, and ethical considerations. The work shows a limited use of sources and materials. Academic and professional skills are weak and there are errors in expression and the work may lack structure overall. There are difficulties in developing professional skills (where appropriate). The work lacks original thought and is largely imitative. |
| Clear fail | 29% and Below | A poor performance in which there are substantial gaps in knowledge and understanding,underpinning theory and ethical considerations. The work shows little evidence in the use of appropriate sources and materials. Academic writing skills are veryweak and there are numerous errors in expression. The work lacks structure overall. Professional skills (where appropriate) arenot developed. The work is imitative. |
Flexible Rates Compatible With Everyone’s Budget
Hire a Professional Essay & Assignment Writer for completing your Academic Assessments
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your US, UK, Singapore college/ university Assignments.
