LAW4012 Contract Law Assignment Brief 2026 | Arden University
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your US, UK, Singapore college/ university Assignments.
| University | Arden University |
| Subject | LAW4012 Contract Law |
LAW4012 Assignment Brief
As part of the formal assessment for the programme you are required to submit a Contract Law assignment. Please refer to your Student Handbook for full details of the programme assessment scheme and general information on preparing and submitting assignments.
Learning Outcomes
After completing the module, you should be able to:
- Define and explain the main principles of contract law.
- Demonstrate an awareness of the practical consequences of the formation of a contract.
- Identify breaches of contract and the appropriate remedies for parties.
- Apply the principles of contract law to authentic scenarios to reach logical and well- reasoned conclusions.
Graduate Attributes: Effective Communication - Communicate knowledge and understanding in written form using appropriate legal terminology.
Guidance
Your assignment should include: a title page containing your student number, the module name, the submission deadline and the exact word count of your submitted document; the appendices if relevant; and a reference list (see referencing section below). You should address all the elements of the assignment task listed below. Please note that tutors will use the assessment criteria set out below in assessing your work.
You must not include your name in your submission because Arden University operates anonymous marking, which means that markers should not be aware of the identity of the student. However, please do not forget to include your STU number.
Maximum word count: 2500 words
Please refer to the full word count policy which can be found in the Student Policies section here: Arden University | Regulatory Framework
Please note the following:
Students are required to indicate the exact word count on the title page of the assessment.
The word count includes everything in the main body of the assessment (including in text citations and references). The word count excludes numerical data in tables, figures, diagrams, footnotes, reference list and appendices. ALL other printed words ARE included in the word count.
Please note that exceeding the word count by over 10% will result in a 10-percentage point deduction.
LAW4012 Assessment Criteria
| Grade | Mark Bands | Generic Assessment Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| First (1) | 80%+ | Outstanding performance which demonstrates the ability to analyse the subject area and to confidently apply theory whilst showing awareness of any relevant ethical considerations. The work shows an outstanding level of competence and confidence in managing appropriate sources and materials, initiative and excellent academic writing skills and professional skills (where appropriate). The work shows originality of thought. |
| Upper second (2:1) | 70-79% | Excellent performance which demonstrates the ability to analyse the subject and apply theory whilst showing some awareness of any relevant ethical considerations. The work shows a high level of competence in managing sources and materials, initiative and excellent academic writing skills and professional skills (where appropriate). The work shows originality of thought. |
| Upper second (2:1) | 60-69% | Very good performance which demonstrates the ability to analyse the subject and apply some theory. The work shows a very good level of competence in managing sources and materials and some initiative. Academic writing skills are very good and expression remains accurate overall. Very good professional skills (where appropriate). The work shows some original thought. |
| Lower second (2:2) | 50-59% | A good performance which begins to analyse the subject and apply some underpinning theory. The work shows a sound level of competence in managing basic sources and materials. Academic writing skills are good, and expression remains accurate overall although the piece may lack structure. Good professional skills (where appropriate). The work lacks some original thought. |
| Third (3) | 40-49% | Satisfactory level of performance in which there are some omissions in understanding the subject, its underpinning theory, and ethical considerations. The work shows a satisfactory use of sources and materials. Academic writing skills are limited and there are some errors in expression and the work may lack structure overall. There are some difficulties in developing professional skills (where appropriate). The work lacks original thought and is largely imitative. |
| Marginal Fail | 30-39% | Limited performance in which there are omissions in understanding the subject, its underpinning theory, and ethical considerations. The work shows a limited use of sources and materials. Academic writing skills are weak and there are errors in expression. The work shows some major weaknesses. Difficulties in developing professional skills (where appropriate). |
| Clear Fail | 29% and Below | A poor performance in which there are substantial gaps in knowledge and understanding, underpinning theory and ethical considerations. The work shows little evidence in the use of appropriate sources and materials. Academic writing skills are very weak and there are numerous errors in expression. The work lacks structure overall. Professional skills (where appropriate) are not developed. The work is imitative. |
Flexible Rates Compatible With Everyone’s Budget
Hire a Professional Essay & Assignment Writer for completing your Academic Assessments
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your US, UK, Singapore college/ university Assignments.
