6010SSL Principles of Strategy Assignment Brief 2026 | Coventry University
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your US, UK, Singapore college/ university Assignments.
| University | Coventry University (CU) |
| Subject | 6010SSL Principles of Strategy |
6010SSL Assignment Brief
| Module Title: | Principles of Strategy | Assignment Number | Coursework 1 |
| Module Code: | 6010SSL | Assignment Title | Individual Report |
| Module Leader: | Dr. Phan Hoang Long | Assignment Credits | 10 |
| Release Date: | 6th October 2025 | ||
| Submission Date/Time: | 12th December 2025 before 16:00 | ||
| Submission
Time and Place: |
Submission through
MS Team and Turnitin |
Assessment Information
This assignment is designed to assess learning outcomes:
- Critically evaluate a range of key theories associated with international business strategic management process.
- Evaluate the importance and the problems inherent in strategic choices and implementing those strategies.
- Explore the extent to which Corporate Social Responsibility is central to a given organisation’s strategic intent.
This is an individual assignment.
Case:
Vietnam consistently ranks among the top global beer markets, leading the ASEAN region in consumption. In 2023, it ranked 7th worldwide, consuming nearly 4.6 billion liters, or 2.4% of the global market. It leads the ASEAN region and surpassed Japan in 2022 to become Asia’s secondlargest beer market after China. However, the Vietnam beer market has witnessed major shakeups recently. After a period of growth, the market experienced a significant drop in 2023 and early 2024, with revenue falling by over 14.4% and consumption decreasing by 13.8%. While the Covid-19 pandemic plays a major role in the decline of the market, the government’s anti-drunkdriving campaign significantly hampers the consumption of beer domestically.
You are an analyst at a strategy consulting firm. To help management assess the competitive landscape of the beer industry in Vietnam, you are required to provide a strategic report to analyse and critically review the industry.
This assessment requires you to:
1) Carry out for the Vietnam’s beer industry:
i. a PESTEL analysis;
ii. a Porter’s Five Forces analysis (including complementor and industry life cycle analyses); and
iii. an evaluation of the importance of Corporate Social Responsibility to brewery firms.
2) What do you conclude about the sector? Critically discuss and evaluate your findings.
Criteria for Assessment
This table details the weightings of the six criteria by which your work will be assessed.
| Criteria | Proportion of overall module mark |
| 1. Content (and Learning Outcomes) | 15% |
| 2. Knowledge and understanding/application of theory | 50% |
| 3. Evidence of reading, use of resources and research | 10% |
| 4. Conclusion | 15% |
| 5. Presentation (structure, use of language, grammar and spelling) and referencing | 10% |
| Total | 100% |
Please refer to the Marking Scheme below for information on how work is assessed and graded.
Marking and Assessment Scheme
| Mark range | Guidelines |
| 70 – 100% | In order to secure a mark in this range, a candidate must submit an outstanding answer that could hardly be bettered. In addition to the criteria identified below for a mark between 70-85%, an answer scoring a mark of 85-100% would show an excellent level of understanding and critical/analytic skills and originality. For example, such an answer would include new insights into Principles of Strategy which are not drawn from the literature but from the student’s own critical thinking, and which add something to the existing literature. A report in this range will demonstrate a strong understanding of theories, concepts and issues relating to Principles of Strategy. There will be evidence of wide-ranging reading from a variety of valid sources (as described and presented in the marking criteria for 60-69%). The assignment must be written in a clear, wellstructured way with a coherent and seamless flow and show evidence of independent, critical thought. It must show extensive relevant reading on the subject and intelligent use of the material to present a well-balanced and wellargued assignment. For example, the student will have considered a range of |
| relevant issues and be able to assess the strength and weaknesses of various approaches/arguments and put forward a confident and articulate view of their own. | |
| 60 – 69% | A report in this mark range will demonstrate a good understanding of the requirements of the assignment and of theories, concepts and issues relating to Principles of Strategy. An assignment in this percentage range will include a balanced discussion of issues central to the question, how these are addressed by different authors or sources and some critical thinking into their relative merits or shortcomings. The answer will contain few errors and little, if any, irrelevant material. It will show evidence of reading from a variety of sources (i.e. more than 3 or 4) but not so many sources that the discussion loses focus and becomes unclear or irrelevant. All sources should be of some academic merit (e.g. books, journals, reports, media publications). Unreferenced material from noncredible internet sources MUST be avoided. All sources must be included and properly referenced in the references. The assignment will be well-organised and clearly written/presented overall. |
| 50 – 59% | The answer will demonstrate some reasonable understanding of relevant theories, concepts and issues relating to Principles of Strategy but also some minor errors of fact or understanding.
The assignment will not be based on an extensive range of sources (for example few references are included), or much evidence that they have been read closely or well-understood. For example, the assignment will retell sources rather than analyse them. The assignment may be quite general in part. Some errors may be present and some irrelevant material may be included. The report may not be particularly well-structured, and/or clearly presented and contain some spelling mistakes and grammatical errors. A few sentences may be unclear. |
| 40 – 49% |
|
| 35 – 39% | A mark within this percentage range will be given to an assignment which: – includes only a limited amount of relevant material. |
|
|
| 20 – 34% | A poor fail on this assignment means the assignment submitted:
Principles of Strategy and to the learning outcomes detailed in this document. – contains some or many fundamental errors and misunderstandings of the academic or other material used. For example many of the facts cited are incorrect.
|
| 0 – 19% | Work within this mark range shows a complete failure to meet the requirements of the assignment. A mark in this range will be given for a report which:
Many sentences are incomprehensible. |
|
Word Count
The word limit is 2000 words for the Individual Report. There will be a penalty of a deduction of 10% of the mark (after internal moderation) for work exceeding the word limit by 10% or more. Reports that are too short will also be penalized. The word limit includes quotations and citations, but excludes the references list. The format should be a report following the below structure:
- Front page with report title
- Executive summary (not included in the word count)
- Table of contents (not included in the word count)
- Introduction
- Section 1 – PESTLE Analysis
- Section 2 – Porters Five Forces Analysis (including complementor and industry life cycle analyses)
- Section 3 – Corporate Social Responsibility
- Conclusion
- References (not included in word count)
- Appendix (if necessary, not included in word count)
How to submit your assessment
The assessment must be submitted by 16:00 on 12th December 2025. No paper copies are required. You can access the submission link through the module web.
- Your coursework will be given a zero mark if you do not submit a copy through Turnitin. Please take care to ensure that you have fully submitted your work.
- Please ensure that you have submitted your work using the correct file format, unreadable files will receive a mark of zero. The Faculty accepts Microsoft Office and PDF documents, unless otherwise advised by the module leader.
- All work submitted after the submission deadline without a valid and approved reason (see below) will be given a mark of zero.
- The University wants you to do your best. However, we know that sometimes events happen which mean that you can’t submit your coursework by the deadline – these events should be beyond your control and not easy to predict. If this happens, you can apply for an extension to your deadline for up to two weeks, or if you need longer, you can apply for a deferral, which takes you to the next assessment period (for example, to the resit period following the main Assessment Boards). You must apply before the deadline. You will find information about the process and what is or is not considered to be an event beyond your control at
https://share.coventry.ac.uk/students/Registry/Pages/Deferrals-and-Extension.aspx
- Students MUST keep a copy and/or an electronic file of their assignment.
- Checks will be made on your work using anti-plagiarism software and approved plagiarism checking websites.
GUIDELINES AND BACKGROUND TO THIS ASSIGNMENT Plagiarism
As part of your study you will be involved in carrying out research and using this when writing up your coursework. It is important that you correctly acknowledge someone else’s writing, thoughts or ideas and that you do not attempt to pass this off as your own work. Doing so is known as plagiarism. It is not acceptable to copy from another source without acknowledging that it is someone else’s writing or thinking. This includes using paraphrasing as well as direct quotations. You are expected to correctly cite and reference the works of others. The Centre for Academic Writing provides documents to help you get this right. If you are unsure, please visit www.coventry.ac.uk/caw. You can also check your understanding of academic conduct by completing the Good Academic Practice quiz available on Moodle.
Self-plagiarism or reuse of work previously submitted
You must not submit work for assessment that you have already submitted (partially or in full), either for your current course or for another qualification of this and any other university, unless this is specifically provided for in your assignment brief or specific course or module information. Where earlier work by you is citable, i.e. it has already been published/submitted, you must reference it clearly. Identical pieces of work submitted concurrently will also be considered to be self-plagiarism. Self-plagiarism is unacceptable because you cannot gain credit for the same work twice.
Turnitin includes a plagiarism detection system and assessors are experienced enough to recognise plagiarism when it occurs. Copying another student’s work, using previous work of your own or copying large sections from a book or the internet are examples of plagiarism and carry serious consequences. Please familiarise yourself with the APA Reference Style nd use it correctly to avoid a case of plagiarism or cheating being brought. Again, if you are unsure, please contact the Centre for Academic Writing, your Progress Coach or a member of the course team.
Return of Marked Work
You can expect to have marked work returned to you by 10th January 2026. If for any reason there is a delay you will be kept informed. Marks and feedback will be provided online via Turnitin, in class and face to face individual sessions. As always, marks will have been internally moderated only, and will therefore be provisional; your mark will be formally agreed later in the year once the external examiner has completed his / her review.
Flexible Rates Compatible With Everyone’s Budget
Hire a Professional Essay & Assignment Writer for completing your Academic Assessments
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your US, UK, Singapore college/ university Assignments.

