BUS-C409-0 Principles of Marketing Assessment Brief 2026 | University of Roehampton
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your US, UK, Singapore college/ university Assignments.
| University | University of Roehampton London (UoRL) |
| Subject | BUS-C409-0 Principles of Marketing |
BUS-C409-0 Assessment Brief
Learning Outcomes
This assessment has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of the following learning outcomes.
By completing this assessment, you will be able to:
- Understand fundamental marketing concepts, theories, and principles and their application in contemporary and global marketing contexts.
- Analyse markets using secondary data sources to identify trends, consumer behaviour, competitors, and opportunities.
- Apply marketing frameworks and theory to develop evidence-based marketing strategies.
- Communicate marketing ideas clearly and professionally using appropriate academic conventions.
- Reflect critically on collaborative learning experiences and personal development.
Employability and Professional Skills
This assessment supports the development of key professional skills required in marketing and business roles.
By completing this assessment, you will be able to develop:
- Market and data analysis skills using industry databases such as Mintel and Statista
- Strategic thinking and problem-solving skills
- Teamwork and collaboration skills (through formative group presentations)
- Professional written communication and presentation skills
- Reflective practice and self-evaluation skills relevant to graduate employment
Assessment Requirements (General Guidance)
Referencing: Harvard referencing system (in-text citations and reference list).
Word count: 2,500 words exactly (no ±10% leeway from 2025/26).
Format:
- Microsoft Word document
- Font: Arial or Calibri, size 11 or 12
- 1.5 line spacing
Data sources: Mandatory use of Mintel and Statista via the University Library.
Structure: Use the section headings provided in this brief.
Academic integrity: Any use of AI tools must be declared and cited appropriately (see AI section).
Formative Assessment
Type of assessment: Group PowerPoint Presentation (in-class)
Weighting: 0%
Assessment Deadline: By the end of Week 4
Instructions for Assessment
The Formative Assessment is a Group Presentation which helps you prepare for your individual summative report. It also gives you the chance to gain experience working in a group and presenting in a safe and non-graded environment. You will work in groups to conduct a MARKET ANALYSIS. You will be using the MINTEL DATABASE for choosing your desired marketing category, and IT MUST BE FROM ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES:
- Beauty and Personal Care
- Food
- Drinks
- Automotive
- Technology and Media
- Pet
Presentation Time: 5-10 minutes
Requirements:
Use at least three Mintel reports plus relevant Statista data to analyse:
- Market size and growth trends
- Key competitors and positioning
- Consumer attitudes and behaviours
- Key market issues and opportunities
Important:
DO NOT introduce a new product or service in the formative task. This analysis will later inform your individual summative product idea.
You are required to include a reflective section (10%) in your summative report based on this group activity. Therefore, participation is compulsory.
Summative Assessment 1
Type of assessment: 2500-word Individual Report
Weighting: 100%
Assessment Deadline: 28/04/26
You are required to write a 2,500-word individual report in which you include the following sections:
- Market Analysis (900–1,000 words – 30%)
- Key market trends and growth
- Competitor analysis and positioning
- Consumer attitudes and behaviours
- Key issues and opportunities
NOTE: Use of Mintel and Statista is Mandatory.
- Product / Service Description (200–300 words – 10%)
- Invent or improvise a new product or service
- Explain the three levels of the product model
- Identify key consumer benefits
- Justify fit with the market analysis
NOTE: You must NOT analyse or propose an existing product.
- Segmentation, Targeting & Positioning (500–600 words – 20%)
- Bases of segmentation used and justification
- Target market profile and persona
- Value proposition statement
- Competitor perceptual map including your product
- Marketing Mix Strategy (500–600 words – 20%)
- Product (branding and packaging)
- Pricing strategy (theory-driven)
- Promotion strategy including digital media
- Distribution/channel strategy
NOTE: You must apply marketing theory, not just describe actions.
- Segmentation, Targeting & Positioning (500–600 words – 20%)
- Bases of segmentation used and justification
- Target market profile and persona
- Value proposition statement
- Competitor perceptual map, including your product
- Marketing Mix Strategy (500–600 words – 20%)
- Product (branding and packaging)
- Pricing strategy (theory-driven)
- Promotion strategy, including digital media
- Distribution/channel strategy
NOTE: You must apply marketing theory, not just describe actions.
- Reflective Account (200–300 words – 10%)
Reflect on your experience of the formative group task:
- What worked well and what did not
- Challenges faced
- What you learned about yourself and group work
- Presentation & Referencing (10%)
- Academic structure and clarity
- Use of visuals (tables, figures, maps)
- Accurate Harvard referencing
Marking Criteria
Assessment will be marked using the UG categorical rubric, aligned with:
- Market Analysis – 30%
- Product Description – 10%
- STP Strategy – 20%
- Marketing Mix – 20%
- Reflective Account – 10%
- Presentation & Referencing – 10%
NOTE: Full grading rubric is provided in the appendix.
Assessment Success Guidance
To achieve a high mark, you should:
- Demonstrate clear linkage between market data, theory, and strategic decisions
- Use Mintel and Statista analytically, not descriptively
- Apply marketing models appropriately and critically
- Present a coherent, realistic, and data-driven product idea
Also, go through the provided exemplars assessments for a new/improvised product and a service. The exemplars are available under the “Assessment Information tab” on the POM module page.
BUSC4090 Assignment Marking Rubric
|
Marking Guidelines for Assessment (first sit) |
100 Exemplary |
85 92 Upper First/Outstanding |
72 75 78 First/Very Good |
62 65 68 2:1/Good |
52 55 58 2:2/Acceptable |
42 45 48 3rd/Bare pass |
32 35 38 Condonable fail |
25 Fail |
0 Missing/ Not done |
|
Market Analysis |
The analysis of the market for this product cannot be improved on. |
The assignment contains an excellent analysis of the market for this product. Excellent use of Mintel and potentially Statista. |
The assignment contains a very good analysis of the market for this product. A very good amount of Mintel and potentially Statista used. |
The assignment contains a good analysis of the market for this product. A good amount of Mintel and potentially Statista used. |
The assignment contains a competent analysis of the market for this product. Some Mintel and potentially Statista used. |
The assignment contains an adequate analysis of the market for this product, though there are some definite weaknesses. A small amount of Mintel and potentially Statista used. |
The assign+S2:S7ment contains only a small amount of analysis of the market for this product |
The assignment contains very little analysis of the market for this product |
No market analysis present. |
|
Product/Service |
The description of the new product cannot be improved upon. |
A large amount of highly relevant information has been provided on the new product. This discussion has been integrated extremely effectively into the assignment. |
A large amount of useful information has been provided on the new product. This discussion has been integrated effectively into the assignment. |
A good amount of useful information has been provided on the new product. This discussion has been integrated well into the assignment. |
A reasonable amount of useful information has been provided on the new product. |
Some useful background information has been provided on the new product. |
Only a small amount of useful and relevant information has been provided on the new product. |
Little useful or relevant information has been provided on the new product. |
No useful or relevant information has been provided on the new product. |
|
STP Strategy |
The analytical approach that has been applied is outstanding and cannot be improved on. |
The analytical approach that has been applied is excellent, with full reference to all the models in the brief. |
The analytical approach that has been applied is very good, with reference to the models in the brief. |
The analytical approach that has been applied is good, with reference to most/all the models in the brief. |
The analytical approach that has been applied is competent, though not all of the models outlined in the brief are present. |
The analytical approach that has been applied is generally adequate but there are some definite weaknesses. Most of the models outlined in the brief are missing. |
The analytical approach that has been applied is weak. |
The analytical approach that has been applied is very poor. |
No analysis. Section missing. |
|
Marketing Mix |
The analytical approach that has been applied is outstanding and cannot be improved upon. |
The analytical approach that has been applied is excellent |
The analytical approach that has been applied is very good |
The analytical approach that has been applied is good. |
The analytical approach that has been applied is competent. |
The analytical approach that has been applied is generally adequate but there are some definite weaknesses. |
The analytical approach that has been applied is weak. |
The analytical approach that has been applied is very poor. |
Marketing Mix is missing. |
|
Reflection |
Outstanding reflection which cannot be improved upon. |
Excellent reflective account of the group work experience, including lessons learnt about group work processes and the student’s own strengths and weaknesses. |
Very good reflective account of the group work experience, including lessons learnt about group work processes and the student’s own strengths and weaknesses. |
Good reflective account of the group work experience, including lessons learnt about group work processes and the student’s own strengths and weaknesses. |
Competent reflection but not enough lessons learnt. |
Adequate reflection but with some definite weaknesses and room for improvement. |
Poor reflection overall, with few lessons learnt. |
Very poor reflection, with no lessons learnt. |
Reflective account is missing. |
|
Presentation |
|
Excellent presentation and formatting throughout. Excellent use of visuals and charts. Excellent referencing throughout. |
|
Good presentation and formatting throughout. Good use of visuals and charts. Good referencing throughout. |
Competent presentation and formatting throughout. Some use of visuals and charts. Referencing is generally fine but certain aspects could be improved. |
Adequate presentation and formatting throughout. Limited use of visuals and charts. Referencing contains some omissions and inconsistencies. |
The assign+S2:S7ment contains only a small amount of analysis of the market for this product |
Poor presentation and formatting throughout. No use of visuals or charts. Referencing is limited. |
Very poor presentation and formatting throughout. No use of visuals or charts. Referencing is extremely limited or missing |
Flexible Rates Compatible With Everyone’s Budget
Hire a Professional Essay & Assignment Writer for completing your Academic Assessments
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your US, UK, Singapore college/ university Assignments.

